Vargentina

The Messi Files

Was Messi Protected?

From Barcelona’s biggest Champions League nights to Argentina’s World Cups, the same accusation keeps returning.

Watch the evidence. Replay the decisions. Deliver the verdict.

The archive

  1. Barcelona Files2006–2017Chelsea. Arsenal. Madrid. Milan. City. Juventus. PSG.Open the Barcelona case
  2. Argentina 2022QatarQatar's soft penalties, the uncarded handball and the final France petitioned.Review 2022
  3. Argentina 2026North AmericaThe tournament that made “VARgentina” global.Review 2026

Latest exhibit · cast your ruling

Exhibit AJBarcelona 6–1 PSG — Champions League 2016/17 Round of 16, Second Leg90

The Penalty That Kept the Impossible Alive

The chargeIn the 90th minute of the Remontada, with PSG still ahead on aggregate, Suárez went down under Marquinhos and Barcelona were given the penalty that kept the comeback alive.

Barcelona needed two more goals when Luis Suárez took the ball into the PSG box with Marquinhos behind him and went down. Deniz Aytekin pointed to the spot. Suárez had already been booked for simulation that night; critics and former referees argued he exaggerated minimal contact, the defence points to contact from behind on a player at full speed. Neymar converted in stoppage time, 5–1, and PSG were still ahead on away goals — for four more minutes.

The facts, as presented

No video assistant existed for this match. The meter measures perceived favour in the referee’s call, not a VAR review.

Decision
Penalty awarded for contact on Luis Suárez
Referee's call
Barcelona were awarded a penalty for Marquinhos' challenge on Suárez; Marquinhos was booked
VAR involvement
No VAR — pre-VAR era; the on-field officials alone
Outcome
Neymar converted to make it 5–1 (5–5 on aggregate); Sergi Roberto then scored the 95th-minute goal that sent Barcelona through

You are the juror. Cast your ruling.

The evidence

Clip hosted by its original publisher.

The Tribunal’s Case Notes

What happened

90th minute, Camp Nou. Neymar's free kick two minutes earlier had made it 4–1 on the night and 4–5 on aggregate; Barcelona needed two more. Luis Suárez took the ball into the PSG area with Marquinhos behind him, felt contact from the defender, and went to ground. Deniz Aytekin pointed to the spot. Neymar converted in the first minute of stoppage time: 5–1, 5–5 on aggregate, PSG still ahead on away goals. Marquinhos was booked. Four minutes later Sergi Roberto scored the sixth.

Suárez had already been booked in the 67th minute for simulation under a challenge from Verratti. PSG's later complaint to UEFA argued that his fall in the 90th should have drawn a second yellow rather than a penalty. Pundits and former referees reviewing the match were largely critical of the award; one described the referee as having 'bought the Suárez dive', another said 'there is contact but Suárez helps a lot with the simulation'.

The prosecution

The prosecution's case rests on the contact, the fall and the card that came first. Replays show Marquinhos' arm and body brushing Suárez from behind; they also show Suárez initiating the collapse, arms out, a beat before the contact would have brought him down. A player already cautioned for simulation that night had, on this reading, done it again — and instead of a second yellow, the referee gave the decision that turned 4–5 into 5–5. Every account of the night's pressure on Aytekin, from the crowd to the surrounding players, converges on this minute.

The consequence makes it the Remontada's hinge. Without the penalty Barcelona needed two goals in stoppage time; with it they needed one, and Sergi Roberto provided it in the 95th. PSG's five-page letter listed the decision; Emery later said Barcelona's players 'kept on diving in the box, putting lots of pressure on the referee until he fell for it'. The prosecution says that is exactly what happened.

The defence

There was contact from behind on a player at full speed inside the area. That is a penalty every week in every league, and the referee is not asked to grade the theatricality of the fall when the foul is real; he is asked whether the defender's contact brought the attacker down or was likely to. Marquinhos was booked, which tells you the referee saw a foul, not a dive. Aytekin was five yards away with a clear view; the critics were watching slow-motion replays from the side.

The defence also notes that PSG's own list of grievances included the opposite complaint at the other end — that Mascherano's foul on Di María was not given — which is a case for saying the referee missed contact in both boxes, not that he favoured one team. And whatever the merits of this penalty, PSG were still ahead on aggregate after it. The tie was lost to a sixth goal four minutes later, scored from open play.

Rule context (2016/17)

Law 12 in 2016/17 awarded a penalty for a careless, reckless or excessively forceful push, trip or charge inside the area, and made simulation — attempting to deceive the referee by feigning injury or pretending to have been fouled — a cautionable offence. A second caution meant a sending-off. The law asked the referee to decide, in real time and without video, which of the two he had seen. VAR arrived in the Champions League the season after next; whether it would have overturned this award is the kind of counterfactual the archive records only as attributed speculation.

Consequence

Neymar scored the penalty to make it 5–1, PSG remained ahead on away goals for four more minutes, and Sergi Roberto's 95th-minute goal completed the first successful overturn of a four-goal first-leg deficit in the competition's history. PSG went home and wrote to UEFA; UEFA's president said referees are not suspended and its press office declined further comment. Aytekin never spoke about the match. The tribunal's VAR Replay scenario, played as PSG from the 85th minute, scripts this penalty as history's second goal against you.

VARgentina is a satirical, fan-voted archive of disputed refereeing decisions involving Lionel Messi’s teams. It does not claim proven corruption, match-fixing or wrongdoing by any player, club, federation or official. Results reflect fan opinion, not verified wrongdoing.